Betwixt and Between
L’Envers et l’endroit (Betwixt and Between) is a phrase coined by the French Algerian writer and philosopher Albert Camus in one of his essays. It captures our current dilemma in the Gulf with the forces at play, wrestling with a series of positions, all supportable from different perspectives, in a tug of war wherein winners will all become partial losers before it’s over. A federal judge in New Orleans (not a trivial point) has blocked the current moratorium on deep water offshore drilling in response to the economic damage that local drilling operators are experiencing. The relationships between economic forces and judicial behaviors are nothing new to any region, and the ethics of the action are not in question. It is an example of the power of the lens we put on an issue and the persuasiveness of a point of view. The lens can create a bias for what we consider or discount in the decisions we make.
Judge Feldman wrote that the Obama administration had failed to justify the need for such “a blanket, generic, indeed punitive, moratorium” on deep-water oil and gas drilling. “The blanket moratorium, with no parameters, seems to assume that because one rig failed and although no one yet fully knows why, all companies and rigs drilling new wells over 500 feet also universally present an imminent danger,” he wrote.
Read More

